By Jon Warner, October 2024
What are the greatest 'care gap' challenges, in US Health and Healthcare, that can be overcome by effective new product development when looking to Implementing Hospital-at-Home strategy and Initiatives?
The United States healthcare system faces many challenges in providing effective and affordable care to all citizens. One area that presents significant opportunities for improvement are the many 'care gap' - situations where patients, essentially, do not receive the right level or location of care. Transitioning more care out of hospitals and into home settings through 'Hospital-at-Home' strategies and initiatives could help close some of these care gaps. However, there are also challenges to overcome in implementing such programs effectively. This article will explore some of the greatest care gap challenges in US health and healthcare, and how new product development could help address them when looking to expand Hospital-at-Home models.
One major care gap challenge is the lack of care coordination and continuity as patients transition between different care settings such as hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and home. All too often, important clinical information is lost during these hand-offs, leading to medical errors, unnecessary readmissions, and poor patient outcomes. New digital health and virtual care tools and platforms can help improve care coordination and continuity. For example, developing universal personal health records that are accessible by all providers may help ensure the right information follows patients throughout their journey. Technologies like telehealth, especially when combined with remote patient monitoring, can also facilitate better communication between care teams and patients at home. With the right tools, Hospital-at-Home programs could deliver highly coordinated care across many different settings.
Insufficient availability of home-based services and equipment is another barrier preventing more and better care from being delivered safely in the home. For Hospital-at-Home models to work at scale, patients need access to things like home nursing visits, physical therapy, nutritional support, remote monitoring devices, and medical equipment/supplies. However, many communities lack adequate home health infrastructure and resources to meet current demand, let alone additional demand from expanded Hospital-at-Home initiatives. Innovations are needed to make home-based services and technologies more affordable and widely accessible. For example, well set up telehealth solutions could help address workforce shortages by allowing clinicians to remotely monitor and treat more patients in their homes. There is also a need for lower-cost, easy-to-use medical devices that empower patients and caregivers to take on tasks traditionally done in hospitals.
Of course, reimbursement challenges present a significant hurdle when deploying digital health and virtual care solutions. Under current payment models, hospitals and healthcare systems have little financial incentive to transition care out of high-revenue inpatient settings and into the home. As a result, Hospital-at-Home programs often struggle to prove their value and gain widespread adoption. Innovative reimbursement approaches are therefore urgently required to properly incentivize providers to invest in home-based care delivery. For instance, new bundled payment models could reimburse hospitals a flat rate for treating an entire episode of care, regardless of location (the so-called “value-based care” approach. This gives providers flexibility to deliver care wherever is most appropriate clinically and cost-effective. Outcomes-based payments that tie reimbursement to metrics like readmission rates may also encourage more innovative, preventative care in lower-cost settings like the home.
New regulatory frameworks and guidance will need development to provide clarity around issues like licensing, scope of practice, privacy/security, and reimbursement for home-based services and technologies. Regulators will need to adapt rules in a way that supports innovation while still protecting patients. For example, streamlined approval pathways for low-to-moderate risk digital health solutions could help accelerate their adoption in Hospital-at-Home programs. Overall, a careful balance needs to be struck between flexibility and oversight as care moves increasingly into less regulated domestic settings. Overcoming reimbursement barriers will be key to unlocking greater investment in Hospital-at-Home initiatives.
Ensuring high-quality, safe care in less controlled home environments presents quality challenges compared to hospitals as well. At home, factors like inconsistent caregiver support, medication non-adherence, and inadequate self-management skills can negatively impact outcomes if not properly addressed. New technologies and programs will be needed to help empower patients and caregivers, and enable remote monitoring, virtual visits, and rapid response when issues do arise at home. Digital health solutions like AI-powered remote patient monitoring platforms, mobile apps for medication management and education, and telehealth services could help plug gaps and enhance safety. Standardized clinical protocols and quality measures will also need development for home-based care. With the right tools and oversight, the quality of Hospital-at-Home care could match or even exceed traditional inpatient care.
Finally, a lack of data and evidence currently limits the case that can be made for Hospital-at-Home initiatives. More rigorous research and data collection will be required to prove their value proposition in terms of outcomes, costs, patient/provider satisfaction, and overall system impact. This includes developing standardized metrics and methodologies for evaluating home-based care programs. Technologies that facilitate real-world data capture have an important role to play. For instance, remote monitoring devices and EHR integration could provide a continuous stream of clinical, financial and operational insights from Hospital-at-Home deployments. With more data (with trend and pattern analysis), the business case can be strengthened, and programs refined based on learnings. Overall evidence development will be key to driving broader adoption, reimbursement changes, and overcoming lingering skepticism about the model.
In conclusion, while the US healthcare system faces significant care gaps, transitioning more care to the home through well-designed Hospital-at-Home initiatives holds promise as one significant strategy for closing some of these gaps. However, new product and service development will be needed to address challenges around care coordination, access to home-based resources, reimbursement incentives, quality and safety, regulations, and evidence building. Technologies like digital health platforms and apps, telehealth, remote monitoring, digital records, and data analytics (perhaps driven by increasingly powerful AI) all have important roles to play. With a concerted focus on innovation, some of the greatest barriers preventing the implementation and scale-up of Hospital-at-Home strategies could potentially be overcome. An improved ability to deliver high-value care in the most appropriate setting - whether hospital or home - would represent an important step towards building a more citizen/patient-centric, cost-effective US healthcare system.
This article was written by Jon Warner, Executive Chair of Citizen Health Strategies (CHS). Citizen Health Strategies (CHS) specializes in building innovative products and solutions where and when health citizens need - eliminating care gaps and bottlenecks to create operational efficiencies and outcome effectiveness.
Comments